Advertisement
Dear Friend,
>
No one voted on Election Day to destroy the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. But President Bush is now claiming a mandate to do exactly that.
>
> Congressional leaders are pushing for a quick vote that would turn America's greatest sanctuary for Arctic wildlife into a vast,
polluted oil field.
>
> Even worse, they are planning to avoid public debate on this
> devastating measure by hiding it in a must-pass budget bill.
>
> Please go to www.savebiogems.org/arctic/t...ction.asp
> right now and send a message telling your U.S. senators and
> representative to reject this sneak attack on the Arctic Refuge.
>
> And please forward my message to your friends, family and colleagues. We must mobilize millions of Americans in opposition as quickly as possible.
>
> Don't believe for a second that the president is targeting the Arctic Refuge for the sake of America's energy security or to lower gas prices at the pump.
>
> President Bush knows full well that oil drilled in the Arctic Refuge
> would take ten years to get to market and would never equal more than a paltry one or two percent of our nation's daily consumption. Simply put, sacrificing the crown jewel of our wildlife heritage would do nothing to reduce gas prices or break our addiction to Persian Gulf oil.
>
> But if the raid on the Arctic Refuge isn't really about gas prices or energy security, then what is it about?
>
> It's the symbolism.
>
> The Arctic Refuge represents everything spectacular and everything endangered about America's natural heritage. It embodies a million years of ecological serenity . . . a vast stretch of pristine wilderness . . . an irreplaceable birthing ground for polar bears, caribou and white wolves.
>
> It is the greatest living reminder that conserving nature in its wild state is a core American value. It stands for every remnant of
> wilderness that we, as a people, have wisely chosen to protect from the relentless march of bulldozers, chain saws and oil rigs.
>
> And that's why the Bush administration is dead set on destroying it.
>
> By unlocking the Arctic Refuge, they hope to open the door for oil, gas and coal giants to invade our last and best wild places: our
western canyonlands, our ancient forests, our coastal waters, even our national monuments.
>
> This is the real agenda behind the raid on the Arctic Refuge and the entire Bush-Cheney energy plan: to transfer our public estate into corporate hands so it can be liquidated for a quick buck.
>
> House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) admitted as much when he said this battle over the Arctic Refuge is really a fight over whether energy exploration will be allowed in similarly sensitive areas in the future. "It's about precedent," Rep. DeLay said.
>
> I take him at his word. If we let the president and Congress plunder the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for the sake of oil company profits, then no piece of our natural heritage will be safe from wholesale destruction.
>
> Please go to www.savebiogems.org/arctic/t...ction.asp
> and tell your senators and representative they have no mandate to destroy the Arctic Refuge. Then please be sure to forward this message to as many people as you can.
>
> And thank you for speaking out at this critical time.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Robert Redford
> Board of Trustees
> Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
>
> . . .
>
> BioGems: Saving Endangered Wild Places
> A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council
> www.savebiogems.org
>
No one voted on Election Day to destroy the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. But President Bush is now claiming a mandate to do exactly that.
>
> Congressional leaders are pushing for a quick vote that would turn America's greatest sanctuary for Arctic wildlife into a vast,
polluted oil field.
>
> Even worse, they are planning to avoid public debate on this
> devastating measure by hiding it in a must-pass budget bill.
>
> Please go to www.savebiogems.org/arctic/t...ction.asp
> right now and send a message telling your U.S. senators and
> representative to reject this sneak attack on the Arctic Refuge.
>
> And please forward my message to your friends, family and colleagues. We must mobilize millions of Americans in opposition as quickly as possible.
>
> Don't believe for a second that the president is targeting the Arctic Refuge for the sake of America's energy security or to lower gas prices at the pump.
>
> President Bush knows full well that oil drilled in the Arctic Refuge
> would take ten years to get to market and would never equal more than a paltry one or two percent of our nation's daily consumption. Simply put, sacrificing the crown jewel of our wildlife heritage would do nothing to reduce gas prices or break our addiction to Persian Gulf oil.
>
> But if the raid on the Arctic Refuge isn't really about gas prices or energy security, then what is it about?
>
> It's the symbolism.
>
> The Arctic Refuge represents everything spectacular and everything endangered about America's natural heritage. It embodies a million years of ecological serenity . . . a vast stretch of pristine wilderness . . . an irreplaceable birthing ground for polar bears, caribou and white wolves.
>
> It is the greatest living reminder that conserving nature in its wild state is a core American value. It stands for every remnant of
> wilderness that we, as a people, have wisely chosen to protect from the relentless march of bulldozers, chain saws and oil rigs.
>
> And that's why the Bush administration is dead set on destroying it.
>
> By unlocking the Arctic Refuge, they hope to open the door for oil, gas and coal giants to invade our last and best wild places: our
western canyonlands, our ancient forests, our coastal waters, even our national monuments.
>
> This is the real agenda behind the raid on the Arctic Refuge and the entire Bush-Cheney energy plan: to transfer our public estate into corporate hands so it can be liquidated for a quick buck.
>
> House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) admitted as much when he said this battle over the Arctic Refuge is really a fight over whether energy exploration will be allowed in similarly sensitive areas in the future. "It's about precedent," Rep. DeLay said.
>
> I take him at his word. If we let the president and Congress plunder the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for the sake of oil company profits, then no piece of our natural heritage will be safe from wholesale destruction.
>
> Please go to www.savebiogems.org/arctic/t...ction.asp
> and tell your senators and representative they have no mandate to destroy the Arctic Refuge. Then please be sure to forward this message to as many people as you can.
>
> And thank you for speaking out at this critical time.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Robert Redford
> Board of Trustees
> Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
>
> . . .
>
> BioGems: Saving Endangered Wild Places
> A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council
> www.savebiogems.org
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: From Robert Redford--Arctic National Wildlife Refuge under attack
Sun, January 23, 2005 - 12:49 PMDone! -
-
Re: From Robert Redford--Arctic National Wildlife Refuge under attack
Sun, January 23, 2005 - 4:30 PMDone
-
-
Re: From Robert Redford--Arctic National Wildlife Refuge under attack
Mon, January 24, 2005 - 7:08 AMdone... -
-
Re: From Robert Redford--Arctic National Wildlife Refuge under attack
Thu, January 27, 2005 - 7:45 AMOne other quick thing...I sent off something to Hillary Clinton, one of my senators and this is what I got back - just FYI...It's nice when it seems that someone is listening.
Dear M. Lockwood:
Thank you for writing about oil drilling in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge. I care about this important environmental issue and I appreciate the time you took to share your concerns with me.
Unspoiled environments like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge are a part of our natural - and our national - heritage. The Arctic Refuge is part of what makes our country unique, beautiful and precious. It deserves protection, not exploitation.
During my time in the Senate, I have worked to ensure that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge will not be opened to unnecessary development. In both the 107th and 108th Congresses, I was an original cosponsor of legislation that would have protected the refuge by designating it as a protected wilderness area. I also joined efforts to remove provisions from the fiscal year 2004 Senate Budget Resolution that would have allowed drilling in the refuge.
Drilling for oil in the Arctic Refuge is bad environmental policy, and it is bad energy policy. It would take ten years of drilling in the Arctic Refuge to produce oil. We do not need to despoil an environmental treasure on a gamble for oil where the odds of finding significant supplies are remote. We instead need to provide the appropriate incentives for the development and use of energy efficient products, alternative and renewable fuels, and improved conservation measures. As a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, I will continue to
work with my colleagues to protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and promote environmentally sound energy policies.
Thank you again for sharing with me your concerns on this important environmental issue. For updates on this and other issues under consideration by the Senate, please visit my website at clinton.senate.gov.
Sincerely yours,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
-